Society for Women in Philosophy (SWIP) UK Session
Saturday 11 July, Sibson Lecture Theatre 2
Calls for papers are now closed (programmes will be added once they are announced).
The SWIP Session is a special panel held on Saturday afternoon which draws together papers that further the aims of SWIP (the Society for Women in Philosophy UK) broadly construed. This includes papers on feminism and related emancipatory philosophies, on women in the history of philosophy, and on achieving gender justice and related forms of justice in the profession. Each talk in the SWIP Session lasts up to 20 minutes and is followed by 10 minutes of discussion.
Pornography without Dehumanization
Inga Bones, Karlsruhe
Neufeld (forthcoming) claims that pornography dehumanizes women by essentializing them as beings with no or reduced capacity for self-determination and that it does so, in many cases at least, through linguistic means, notably by use of gender-specific pejoratives targeting women. As opposed to Neufeld, I argue that gender-specific pejoratives are not plausibly construed as essentializing expressions and that any further linguistic evidence provided by Neufeld (forth-coming) does not suffice to establish the claim that pornography dehumanizes women, either.
Normativity and Gender Identity
Richard Rowland, Leeds
According to Jenkins’ influential account of gender identity, for A to have the gender identity G is for A to experience the norms that are associated with G in her social context as relevant to her. I argue that: (i) in order for this account to make good on its aims an account of what such experiences of norm relevancy are is needed; (ii) we should reject a natural view of such experiences; and (iii) we should understand these experiences of norm relevancy as experiences of non-instrumental normative reasons to conform with the norms associated with the relevant gender.
“My black friend says it’s fine”: Reflections on Disagreement, Ideology, and Testimony
Azita Chellappoo, LSE
Our social location shapes our perspective as a knower, and therefore what we are in a position to know. When individuals of different social locations disagree on a claim relevant to their social location, we can refer to their social location in understanding why one is justified in their belief and the other is not. However, a problem arises when individuals of the same social location disagree. I consider these, and other problem cases, arguing that the solution given by standpoint theorists and others to these cases is mistaken in that devalues the particular role of lived experience and testimony.
Emotion, Epistemic Justification, and Oppresssive Structures
Eilidh Harrison, Glasgow
According to a promising view in the philosophy of emotion, an emotional experience is capable of justifying one’s evaluative belief iff the emoter manifests both generative and doxastic emotional competence in the formation of that emotion and the corresponding belief. One problem for this view is that it cannot account for the epistemic value of emotions experienced by members of oppressed groups in light of the corrosive effects of an oppressive socio-political climate on the emotional competences of subordinated individuals. This paper will explore this challenge and propose a tentative solution based on the notion of emotional learning.
SWIP is committed to ensuring that financial considerations do not pose a barrier to participation. In the case of presenters who are not able to access institutional funding and would not otherwise be able to attend, we will cover the cost of early bird registration and contribute to the costs of basic travel and accommodation up to a maximum of £250.
- Submissions should be no more than 2000 words, including footnotes and bibliography, and should begin with an abstract of no more than 100 words.
- Submissions should be prepared for anonymous review. The following details should be included in the email: name of the author, title of the paper, and institution. Submissions should not include any self-identifying references in the body or footnotes of the text.
- Submissions should be typewritten in a standard 12 pt font and single-spaced throughout (including references and quotations). All pages should be numbered and have margins of one inch or more.
- Submissions should be formatted in PDF.
- Only one paper per individual may be submitted.
- Submissions for the SWIP session should not be submitted to either the Open Sessions or the Postgraduate sessions. However, those papers which are not selected for the SWIP session but are deemed suitable for the Open Sessions will be passed to the Open Sessions organisers for consideration. If you do not wish your paper to be passed on, please indicate this in your email.
- Authors whose papers have been accepted for the SWIP Session will be informed by the end of March 2020.
Submissions should be emailed to firstname.lastname@example.org no later than 23:59 BST on 1 February 2020