Social Critiques of Law

Featured story

Crisis: Knowledge, History, Law, 29 January 2016

Organizer: Thanos Zartaloudis (Kent Law School & AA School of Architecture)
Assistants: Michalis Zivanaris (PhD Candidate, Kent Law School) & Gian Giacomo Fusco (PhD Candidate, Kent Law School)

Funded by: Social Critiques of Law Research Group (Directors: Emilie Cloatre & Donatella Alessandrini) & Kent Law School, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

Confirmed Speakers:

Janet Roitman (The New School for Social Research, New York)
Emanuele Coccia (Centre d’Histoire et Théorie des Arts (CEHTA – EHESS), Paris, and The Italian Academy for Advanced Studies in America, Columbia University)
Marika Rose (University of Durham, Department of Theology and Religion)
Anton Schütz (University of London, Birkbeck College, School of Law)
Esther Leslie (University of London, Birkbeck College, Department of English and Humanities)
Stathis Gourgouris (Columbia University, Classics, English; Institute for Comparative Literature and Society)
Ilias Papagianopoulos (University of Piraeus, International and European Studies)
Marina Lathouri (Architectural Association, London, School of Architecture & University of Cambridge, School of Architecture)
Bo Isenberg (Lund University, Faculty of Sociology)
Marinos Diamantides (University of London, Birkbeck College, School of Law)

We are told that we are “immersed” in crisis: European sovereign debt crisis, the subprime crisis in the United States, the crisis in Afghanistan, the crisis in Darfur, the crisis in the Congo, in Syria, in Cairo, in the Middle East, ecologic crisis and so forth (cf. Roitman), the modern city is crisis, nihilism is crisis and so forth. A bad infinity of crises amounting, in one view, to a ‘global crisis’ that forms a ‘surface effect’ in the reversal of the relation between humans and the world (Serres). To not just enter a moment of crisis, but to be in crisis raises then at first significant entry-level questions (i.e. Who decides whether there is ‘a crisis’? What are the outcomes of being in a permanent state of ‘crisis’? etc.)

Yet at the same time it questions the peculiar nature of crisis as such: its paradoxical elevated status through conditioning normalcy while suspending it; and at the same time its endless encroachment over social processes and beings which, as time goes by, become tomorrow’s normalcy.

For a full programme, please see here (includes useful information, schedule, abstracts and biographies, thematic outline and indicative reading list).