{"id":843,"date":"2022-07-01T16:19:51","date_gmt":"2022-07-01T15:19:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/research.kent.ac.uk\/anglican-history-theology\/?p=843"},"modified":"2022-10-05T16:21:52","modified_gmt":"2022-10-05T15:21:52","slug":"a-spiritual-and-political-voice-80th-anniversary-of-the-enthronement-of-william-temple","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/research.kent.ac.uk\/anglican-history-theology\/a-spiritual-and-political-voice-80th-anniversary-of-the-enthronement-of-william-temple\/","title":{"rendered":"A Spiritual and Political Voice: 80th Anniversary of the Enthronement of William Temple"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Political statements by Archbishops of Canterbury have long resulted in debate about the relation of the church to politics and it seems appropriate, in the current context of the government response to Archbishop Justin Welby\u2019s ethical concerns with government asylum plans, that we should recall the 80th anniversary of the enthronement of an archbishop that demonstrated a profound commitment to Christian ethical engagement in social and political issues. Archbishop William Temple was enthroned at Canterbury Cathedral on the festival of St. George on 23<sup>rd<\/sup> April 1942.<\/p>\n<p>According to Dominic Bellinger and Stella Fletcher\u2019s study of the history of archbishops, <em>The Mitre and the Crown <\/em>(Sutton Publishing, 2005, p.166), Archbishop William Temple was viewed as \u201cprobably the most actively political of the modern archbishops of Canterbury\u201d. His active contribution to the creation of the welfare state, alongside William Beveridge, can be seen in his famous text <em>Christianity and Social Order<\/em> (1942), on which the Centre for Anglican History and Theology and the William Temple Foundation hosted a recent conference at Canterbury Cathedral, to reflect on its continuing importance 80 years on from its publication. <em>Christianity and Social Order <\/em>first appeared with William Temple named as Archbishop of York, but within months this successful text appeared with the new title of Archbishop of Canterbury. If Boris Johnson was concerned with his Archbishop\u2019s political statements, Winston Churchill, as noted by various commentators, was not happy with the appointment of William Temple and his social agenda: see John Kent <em>William Temple <\/em>(Cambridge, 1992) and Stephen Spencer <em>William Temple: A Calling to Prophecy <\/em>(SPCK, 2001). However, as the letter recommendatory of George VI, written on the 1<sup>st<\/sup> April 1942, confirms, he was appointed as the \u2018new primate of all England\u2019. This official document, with its royal stamp, is held in the Canterbury Cathedral Archives and Library (document CCA-DCc\/SV1\/1942\/27) and reveals the importance of the Canterbury Cathedral archive for the key historical documents of William Temple\u2019s enthonement and the events surrounding this historic moment.<\/p>\n<p>While the official papers of William Temple as Archbishop of Canterbury are held at Lambeth Palace Library, alongside other papers deposited after his death by his widow Frances, the Canterbury Cathedral Archives and Library holds material relating to the translation of Temple to the See of Canterbury, to his formal election by the Greater Chapter of the Cathedral, to his enthronement, and to his funeral. There is also a set of manuscripts of sermons delivered at the Cathedral, and broadcast on radio, between Palm Sunday and Easter Day 1942, just after his appointment and just before his enthronement. These were presented by Frances Temple to the Cathedral. She notes in a covering letter how glad her late husband was \u201cthat the first time he spoke to the country on the radio after his appointment to Canterbury he should be speaking on a purely spiritual subject\u201d.\u00a0However, his Easter address of the 5<sup>th<\/sup> April 1942, revealed a spiritual message that would bridge the ethical life with the political. He stated in this address that the call to Easter was not a call to \u201ceasy assurance of enjoyment in a heaven of selfish happiness\u201d but rather a place \u201cwhere love and self-giving are made perfect\u201d. Temple\u2019s spirituality was one grounded in a vision of ethical and social concern, through overcoming the self-centred approach and building a life of loving and compassionate relation to the world.<\/p>\n<p>The Canterbury Cathedral Archives and Library also holds the old BBC recordings of the Enthronement, 10 x 78rpm disks (CCA-U202\/2), now digitalised by the BBC. Listening to these recordings and viewing the Path\u00e9 film \u2013 an enthronement \u201cfilmed for the first time in history\u201d (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=SOsSjVvGvRY\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=SOsSjVvGvRY<\/a>) \u2013 you are taken back to the particular historical context of an Archbishop appointed during the war. The commentary informs us the windows are boarded up and precious glass removed and stored away; the austerity of the war time ceremony is evident. We hear evocative descriptions of the statue of Frederick Temple, the 95<sup>th<\/sup> Archbishop of Canterbury, echoing the significance of William Temple as the first son of an Archbishop of Canterbury to be enthroned into the same position and become the 98<sup>th<\/sup> Archbishop of Canterbury. The listener is also struck by the powerful liturgical singing. Though there were some day choristers living locally in Canterbury who continued to sing throughout the war, the boy choristers were returned from evacuation in Cornwall for the Enthronement. (They would also be sadly returned for William Temple\u2019s funeral a few years later in 1944.)<\/p>\n<p>The BBC recordings of the enthronement of William Temple presents the \u201cmain part of the ceremony and his Grace\u2019s address which we (the BBC) had the privilege of recording for listeners at home and overseas\u201d. It is significant that there were representatives of world churches, including the Russian and Greek Orthodox churches; William Temple worked tirelessly for ecumenical unity and his address also affirmed not only unity and fellowship of the Anglican Communion, but also recognised and valued \u201ctraditions other than our own\u201d.<\/p>\n<div>\n<p class=\"xmsonormal\">Along with the \u201cInstrument of Proceedings\u201d, a document made by the Notary Public to formally record the event in writing (also held in the Canterbury Cathedral Archive and Library, see CCA-DCc\/SV1\/1942\/29), the eloquent descriptions of the BBC recording capture the moment when Temple \u201cmoves down the crimson steps from the high-altar towards the [marble] episcopal throne\u201d of St. Augustine, the first Archbishop in 597. After Archbishop Temple kisses the book of the gospels we listen to the making of the corporal oath. With the recorded crackling sounds of rumbling chairs and echoing coughs, we then hear how the Archdeacon takes the Archbishop by the hand and places him on the episcopal throne and he is \u201cinducted, installed and enthroned\u201d into the archbishopric.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"xmsonormal\">Disks 6-8 of the BBC recording capture Archbishop Temple\u2019s enthronement address. This was published in a 1944 collection of Temple\u2019s addresses and talks, <i>The Church Looks Forward <\/i>(Macmillan, 1944), but the recording brings it alive, particularly the \u201cfew personal words\u201d expressing his \u201csense of complete inadequacy\u201d in following those he has known. Here he opens personal reflections on the Archbishops of Canterbury he knew in his life: Edward White Benson (\u201cwise stateman and true priest\u201d), his father Frederick Temple (\u201cthe chief inspiration of my life\u201d), Randall Thomas Davidson (\u201ca second father to me\u201d) and his predecessor Cosmo Gordon Lang (\u201cmost wise elder counsellor and ever more intimate friend\u201d). As he openly affirmed: \u201cTo follow such men is daunting\u201d. But the force of the enthronement service, as a \u201cdedication of the Church, the nation and ourselves to the purpose of God\u201d, overcomes these feelings of inadequacy. It is that conviction that shapes the moment of the enthronement. Addressing a nation facing the horrors of war, he felt that St. George\u2019s day was appropriate for the enthronement, because it held the sense of service and martyrdom in the national identity at a time of world war. He also spoke of the Church World Conferences (in Stockholm, Lausanne, Jerusalem, Oxford, Edinburgh, Madras and Amsterdam) carrying the ecumenical and social concerns of Christianity. The themes of peace, faith and unity and, above all, that ethical devotion to following the \u201cpurpose of God\u201d framed the address. The address revealed the central focus of his work in bringing Christian principles to shape the national agenda. The enthronement of William Temple was recognition of his lifelong leadership in the church and his unique ability to bring a spiritual and political voice into the world.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p class=\"xmsonormal\">80 years after the BBC recorded the events of William Temple\u2019s enthronement, it is striking that the Research Director of the William Temple Foundation, Professor Chris Baker, was asked to comment on <i>BBC World News<\/i> about the response to Justin Welby\u2019s challenge to government and explain why Temple is relevant to this discussion (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=rKkjbkty6m4\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=rKkjbkty6m4<\/a>). Professor Baker explained that for Temple it was \u201cthe duty of the church to shape society, and the way society thinks, in accordance with the principles of God\u201d. Temple shows how the spiritual and political are joined together. The grand ritual of Temple\u2019s enthronement and his Holy Week addresses, preserved in Canterbury Cathedral Archive and Library, signal how Temple\u2019s vision roots his normative Christian ethical values in the theological purpose of God. It provides a moral dimension beyond history to ground the interventions and actions within human life. William Temple\u2019s enthronement as Archbishop of Canterbury is an historical event that is not only wonderfully preserved in word, sound and image, but one that continues to demonstrate the importance of uniting the spiritual and political in the face of the challenges of war and social injustice.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Political statements by Archbishops of Canterbury have long resulted in debate about the relation of the church to politics and it seems appropriate, in the current context of the government response to Archbishop Justin Welby\u2019s ethical concerns with government asylum plans, that we should recall the 80th anniversary of the enthronement of an archbishop that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1761,"featured_media":687,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-843","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-global-anglican"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.kent.ac.uk\/anglican-history-theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/843","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.kent.ac.uk\/anglican-history-theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.kent.ac.uk\/anglican-history-theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.kent.ac.uk\/anglican-history-theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1761"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.kent.ac.uk\/anglican-history-theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=843"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/research.kent.ac.uk\/anglican-history-theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/843\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":849,"href":"https:\/\/research.kent.ac.uk\/anglican-history-theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/843\/revisions\/849"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.kent.ac.uk\/anglican-history-theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/687"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.kent.ac.uk\/anglican-history-theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=843"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.kent.ac.uk\/anglican-history-theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=843"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.kent.ac.uk\/anglican-history-theology\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=843"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}